Next: 4.2.4 Variational equation
Up: 4.2 Proof of the
Previous: 4.2.2 Temporal control perturbation
Contents
Index
4.2.3 Spatial control perturbation
We now construct control perturbations known as
``needle" perturbations, or Pontryagin-McShane perturbations. As the first
name suggests, they will be represented by pulses of short duration; the reason for
the second name is
that perturbations
of this kind
were first used by McShane in calculus of variations
(see Section 3.1.2)
and later adopted by Pontryagin's school for the proof of the maximum principle.
Let
be an arbitrary element of
the control set
. Consider the interval
, where
is a point of
continuity4.2 of
,
is arbitrary, and
is
small. We
define the perturbed control
Figure 4.5 illustrates this control perturbation and the resulting
state trajectory perturbation. As the figure suggests, the perturbed trajectory
corresponding to
will deviate from
on the interval
and
afterwards will ``run
parallel" to
.
We now proceed to formally characterize the deviation over
; the behavior
of
over the interval
will be studied in Section 4.2.4.
Figure:
A spatial control perturbation and its effect on the
trajectory
|
We will let
denote equality up to terms of order
.
The first-order Taylor expansion of
around
gives
 |
(4.10) |
Rearranging terms and using the fact that
satisfies the differential equation (4.7) with
, we have
 |
(4.11) |
On the other hand, the first-order Taylor expansion of the perturbed solution
around
yields
where by
we mean the right-sided derivative of
at
.
Since
by
construction and
satisfies (4.7) with
, we obtain
 |
(4.12) |
We now apply the Taylor expansion to the last term in (4.12):
 |
(4.13) |
In view of (4.10), the second term on the right-hand side of (4.13) is of order
; hence we can omit it and the approximation will remain valid.
Thus (4.12) simplifies to
Comparing this formula with (4.11), we arrive at
 |
(4.14) |
where
 |
(4.15) |
Intuitively, this result makes sense: up to terms of order
, the difference between the two states
and
is the difference (4.15) between the state velocities at
corresponding to
and
, multiplied by the length
of the time interval on which the perturbation is acting.
Next: 4.2.4 Variational equation
Up: 4.2 Proof of the
Previous: 4.2.2 Temporal control perturbation
Contents
Index
Daniel
2010-12-20